Prove your IT general controls work before year-end testing does it for you.

The challenge

IT gen­er­al con­trols sit un­der­neath every au­to­mat­ed con­trol and every sys­tem re­port your busi­ness re­lies on. When an ITGC fails, the dam­age spreads. One un­re­viewed ac­cess change or untest­ed code re­lease can call into ques­tion every con­trol that de­pends on that sys­tem. Many teams dis­cov­er the prob­lem only when ex­ter­nal au­di­tors ex­pand their test­ing, or when an ex­am­in­er asks for ev­i­dence that was never kept.

How we help

We test ITGCs across the four do­mains that mat­ter most. Logical ac­cess cov­ers pro­vi­sion­ing, ter­mi­na­tions, priv­i­leged ac­cess, and user ac­cess re­views. Change man­age­ment cov­ers ap­provals, test­ing, and the sep­a­ra­tion be­tween de­vel­op­ers and pro­duc­tion. IT op­er­a­tions cov­ers job sched­ul­ing and in­ci­dent han­dling. The fourth do­main is back­up and re­cov­ery.

For each con­trol, we con­firm the de­sign ad­dress­es the risk, then test whether it op­er­at­ed through­out the pe­ri­od, using sys­tem-gen­er­at­ed ev­i­dence rather than screen­shots taken on the day. Where your con­trols sup­port fi­nan­cial re­port­ing, we align the work with SOX ex­pec­ta­tions for man­age­ment and in­ter­nal audit, so your ex­ter­nal au­di­tors can re­view it ef­fi­cient­ly.

Every ex­cep­tion comes with a root cause and a fix your con­trol owner agrees to. We retest re­me­di­at­ed con­trols be­fore the issue clos­es.

What you get

  • ITGC risk and control matrix review, mapped to in-scope systems
  • Design and operating effectiveness testing across access, change, operations, and recovery
  • Privileged access and user access review testing
  • Segregation of duties analysis for change and production access
  • SOX-aligned testing for management's assessment and internal audit
  • Exception analysis with root causes, owners, and retesting

Standards we work with: COBIT 2019, the COSO Internal Control frame­work, ISACA's IT Audit Framework (ITAF), and the IIA Global Internal Audit Standards.

We test con­trols for man­age­ment and in­ter­nal audit. We don't issue an audit opin­ion on your fi­nan­cial state­ments or on in­ter­nal con­trol over fi­nan­cial re­port­ing.

Good fit if year-end test­ing is com­ing, your ex­ter­nal au­di­tors have raised ITGC de­fi­cien­cies, or a new sys­tem went live and no­body has test­ed its con­trols.

Questions clients ask

How is ITGC testing different from an external audit?

We test your controls for management or internal audit and report findings and fixes. Your external auditor forms its own opinion and decides whether to use any of that work. We don't issue audit opinions.

Which systems should be in scope?

Systems that support financial reporting or critical operations, along with the databases, operating systems, and tools underneath them. We help you set that scope at the start.

More in IT & Cybersecurity Audit Advisory

Risk-Based and Co-Sourced IT Audit

IT audit planned around your critical systems and obligations, delivered as a full outsourced function or as added capacity inside your own team.

  • A risk-based IT audit plan tied to critical systems and obligations
  • Co-sourced or outsourced delivery within your methodology
  • Workpapers built to stand up to review by your external auditors
Learn more about Risk-Based and Co-Sourced IT Audit

Application Control and Key Report Testing

Testing of the automated controls inside your applications, the interfaces between them, and the system reports (IPE) people use as evidence.

  • Automated calculations, edit checks, and configurations
  • Interface completeness and accuracy
  • Key report (IPE) completeness and accuracy testing
Learn more about Application Control and Key Report Testing

SOX IT Controls Support

Support for management and internal audit across SOX IT scoping, control design, walkthroughs, testing, and remediation.

  • IT scoping and risk and control matrix design
  • Walkthroughs and control testing
  • Deficiency remediation support
Learn more about SOX IT Controls Support

Cybersecurity Program Assessment

An assessment of your security program against NIST CSF 2.0, ISO/IEC 27001, or CIS Controls, with findings ranked by business impact.

  • Control and maturity assessment against your chosen framework
  • Vulnerability, patch, and configuration management review
  • A prioritized roadmap with a summary for the CIO, CISO, and board
Learn more about Cybersecurity Program Assessment

Cloud Security Assessment

A review of identity, configuration, logging, and recovery controls in AWS and Azure, mapped to the shared responsibility model.

  • Identity and access configuration in AWS and Azure
  • Secure configuration, logging, and monitoring
  • Backup and recovery for cloud workloads
Explore about Cloud Security Assessment

Identity and Access Management Review

An enterprise-wide review of how identities are created, reviewed, and removed, with a focus on privileged accounts and joiner, mover, and leaver controls.

  • Joiner, mover, and leaver process review
  • Privileged access management review
  • User access review quality and coverage
Learn more about Identity and Access Management Review

Ransomware Readiness Assessment

A review of whether you could detect, contain, and recover from ransomware, starting with backups you have actually restored.

  • Backup isolation and restore testing review
  • Incident response plan and tabletop readiness
  • Recovery priorities for critical systems
Learn more about Ransomware Readiness Assessment

View All Services

Ways to work with us

Project engagements

A defined scope, timeline, and deliverable, such as an IT review, an AI governance build, or a remediation plan.

Advisory support

Ongoing access to senior guidance as your program, systems, and regulators change.

Audit capacity support

Added hands and specialist skill for your internal audit or risk team, working under your direction.

Training programs

Workshops and cohorts for your team, delivered on a schedule that suits you.

How we engage

  1. Discovery

    A short call to understand your situation.

  2. Scoping

    A written scope with deliverables, timing, and fees.

  3. Delivery

    Regular check-ins and findings you can read in one sitting.

  4. Follow-up

    A review of progress, plus support for what comes next.

Common questions

Are you a CPA firm?

No. We're a risk and tech­nol­o­gy ad­vi­so­ry firm. We don't per­form fi­nan­cial state­ment au­dits or issue audit opin­ions.

Can you help us prepare for SOC 2 or a similar report?

Yes, on the readi­ness side: gap as­sess­ment, con­trol de­sign, and ev­i­dence prepa­ra­tion. The re­port it­self must come from a li­censed CPA firm.

Do you work with our internal and external auditors?

Yes. We co­or­di­nate with in­ter­nal audit, your ex­ter­nal au­di­tors, and your com­pli­ance team so work isn't du­pli­cat­ed.

How long does an engagement take?

It de­pends on scope. After a scop­ing call, you'll get a time­line in writ­ing.

What size organizations do you work with?

Mid-mar­ket and en­ter­prise or­ga­ni­za­tions across in­dus­tries.

Will you keep our information confidential?

Yes. We'll sign an NDA be­fore you share sen­si­tive de­tails.

Can you assess an AI program you helped design?

No. We don't audit or as­sess an AI pro­gram, sys­tem, or use case we de­signed for the same client. If an en­gage­ment would cross that line, we'll tell you dur­ing scop­ing.

Is this legal advice?

No. We sup­port reg­u­la­to­ry align­ment from a risk and con­trols per­spec­tive. For legal ques­tions, work with coun­sel.

Not sure which service fits?

Describe the problem. We'll tell you where to start.