Careful analysis. Traceable evidence. Defensible conclusions.
The challenge
A disÂcrepÂanÂcy raisÂes quesÂtions, and guessÂing at the anÂswers is exÂpenÂsive. Modern fraud alÂmost alÂways runs through sysÂtems: acÂcess someÂone shouldn't have, an apÂproval limit noÂbody enÂforces, a conÂtrol that looks sound on paper and never fires.
How we help
We exÂamÂine the transÂacÂtions, records, apÂprovals, and sysÂtem acÂcess around an irÂregÂuÂlarÂiÂty, and we keep docÂuÂmentÂed fact, asÂsumpÂtion, and open quesÂtion apart at every step. For each transÂacÂtion, we ask whether it served a leÂgitÂiÂmate busiÂness purÂpose, whether the supÂportÂing records hold up, and whether evÂiÂdence from anÂothÂer source conÂfirms the exÂplaÂnaÂtion.
Data anÂaÂlytÂics let us test enÂtire popÂuÂlaÂtions inÂstead of samÂples. That surÂfaces duÂpliÂcate payÂments, unÂfaÂmilÂiar venÂdors, round-dolÂlar enÂtries, split purÂchasÂes, and acÂtivÂiÂty outÂside norÂmal hours. Where records conÂflict or supÂport is missÂing, we name the gap and the work needÂed to close it. Our conÂcluÂsions never reach furÂther than the evÂiÂdence.
We also look at the conÂdiÂtions that alÂlowed the probÂlem to hapÂpen or go unÂnoÂticed, such as exÂcess acÂcess, unÂenÂforced apÂproval limÂits, and missÂing reÂviews. Fixing those is what preÂvents a reÂpeat.
Standards we work with: The COSO and ACFE Fraud Risk Management Guide, the ACFE Fraud Tree, and the COSO Internal Control frameÂwork.
We aren't a CPA firm, and we don't give acÂcountÂing or legal opinÂions. If a matÂter may lead to litÂiÂgaÂtion or a regÂuÂlaÂtoÂry reÂferÂral, inÂvolve your legal counÂsel beÂfore the work beÂgins.
Good fit if someÂthing in the numÂbers doesn't add up, or your audit comÂmitÂtee wants an outÂside view of fraud risk.
Related topics
- Forensic accounting
- Fraud risk assessment
- Fraud examination
- Forensic data analysis
- Journal entry testing
- Procurement and payment fraud